I just finished watching “The Bicycle Thief” and it was a
very good movie. I can see why this movie was number one in British film
magazine Sight and Sound. If Roger Ebert didn’t tell me that these actors were
more less casted right off the street and were not professional actors, I would
have thought the actors in “The Bicycle Thief” were professional actors. I
believe by not using professional actors and using regular people off the
street helped give this movie a better sense of realism. I think this because
maybe people right off the street will be able to show better the struggles the
man goes through than a professional. I also think that there will always be an
interest in the material world because using material objects is one of the
easiest ways to compare two people. We can see this during the scene in the pizzeria.
We see Bruno who is very happy to get a mozzarella cheese sandwich, but we see
Bruno keep looking over his shoulder at a rich boy who is getting platefuls of spaghetti.
The rich boy gives Bruno a look to say that he is better than him just because
he his eating spaghetti and Bruno isn’t eating spaghetti. I find it weird that
when Ricci got his bike stolen the first time no one really tried to help him
stop the thief, but when Ricci steals a bike the whole neighborhood tries and
stops him.
Your final point about the stolen bike is worth considering more---seems to highlight the RBalloon idea here that the individual is always at war with society.
ReplyDelete