This is my first time watching a film that is this old. The
first thing that I did notice throughout the film was the lack of dialogue.
Every movie that I have ever watched has used dialogue as one of the primary
methods to move the plot along. The Red Balloon almost completely ignored dialogue
to move along the plot. I think there was only like five or six lines
throughout the movie. To help move along the plot we see the director use other
means to help with the movement of the plot. These things include: music,
moving through different locations, and actor’s body language. First the music
helps because there are scenes when not much is happening or something sad has
happened and the music is more mellow that other parts of the movie. Continuing
with music, when we see the young boy being chased through the alleyways
towards the end, we can hear the music have more tempo to it. Secondly, the use
of different locations helps the movie. Since there is basically no dialogue,
the movie relies on different locations to help with the plot. Lastly, the body
language of the actors. We can see this most easily in the last scene of the
movie when the little boy loses his balloon you can see how sad he is; then
when all of those balloons come to him you can see how happy he is. The one
thing I found hard with the movie was it wasn’t in English, but we had English subtitles.
I find it hard to concentrate on a movie when I have to read subtitles, but it’s
only a minor inconvenience. I think this film is trying to fight Hollywood ideals
on how a movie is spouse to look.
Interesting you focus on the lack of dialogue--of course, some of the only real memorable dialogue is OBEY ME (which the balloon doesn't).... it seems as if the film isn't interested in words (or rules?)
ReplyDeleteWorth also thinking more on how a French film became an international hit by making itself accessible to all. Is this about moving beyond borders/boundaries of speech/country, etc?--as you say, fighting overblown Hollywood with a 30 minute film.